Assignment -4p partnering with nonprofits

Conduct research on nonprofits that partnered with Africa to reduce AIDS/HIV during the second Bush administration. In 750-1,000 words, do the following:

1. Explain how the nonprofits filled the need.
2. Describe why nonprofits were able to fill the need when other entities were not able too.
3. Describe the intended and unintended consequences of these partnerships.

Use two to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. 

 
Save Link Assignment Partnering with Nonprofits
View RubricDue Date: Oct 17, 2018 23:59:59       Max Points: 110

Details:

Conduct research on nonprofits that partnered with Africa to reduce AIDS/HIV during the second Bush administration. In 750-1,000 words, do the following:

1. Explain how the nonprofits filled the need.
2. Describe why nonprofits were able to fill the need when other entities were not able too.
3. Describe the intended and unintended consequences of these partnerships.

Use two to four scholarly resources to support your explanations.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New AttemptTitleAttached DocumentsCitation ReportSimilarity IndexFinal Submission Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Apply Rubrics

Partnering with Nonprofits
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%3
Satisfactory
79.00%4
Good
87.00%5
Excellent
100.00%70.0 %Content 25.0 %Explain how nonprofits filled a need.Explanation of how nonprofits filled a need is missing.Explanation of how nonprofits filled a need is vague, inconsistent, and has no support from research.Explanation of how nonprofits filled a need is present and supported by some research.Explanation of how nonprofits filled a need is present, clear, and supported by research.Explanation of how nonprofits filled a need is clear, concise, and supported by research.20.0 %Describe why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not.Description of why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not is missing.Description of why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not is vague, inconsistent, and has no support from research.Description of why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not is present and supported by some research.Description of why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not is present, clear, and supported by research.Description of why nonprofits were able to fill a need when other entities were not is clear, concise, and supported by research.25.0 %Describe the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnershipsDescription of the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnerships is missing.Description of the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnerships is vague, inconsistent, and has no support from research.Description of the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnerships is present and supported by some research.Description of the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnerships is present, clear, and supported by research.Description of the intended and unintended consequences of nonprofit partnerships is clear, concise, and supported by research.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.