Organization behaviour | Organization behavior | Columbia College Chicago

 The assigned cases focus on specific (real-life) OB issues like motivation, culture, and ethics encountered by managers and leaders that can be applied to your everyday encounters in the workplace and at home

Paper must also be formatted according to MLA guidelines. Papers must be five to seven pages in length with current and updated references.

Case study must contain the following:

Synopsis

A synopsis is a brief overview of the case. Please prepare your synopsis as if I (and your classmates) do not have the whole case study. Your synopsis should be concise, complete, and fully describe the situation “as you see it.” The synopsis should not exceed four to five paragraphs.

At the end of your synopsis, you must identify three Organizational Behavior problems that must be addressed.

Problem Analyses

For each of the three identified problems, you must analyze them, drawing from the content covered in class. These analyses should identify the causes of each problem.

Each of the three Problem Analyses should be no more than three to four sentences in length. Be succinct.

Problem Recommendations

For each problem, you must provide a solution. Recommendations must directly tie to the Organizational Behavior problem you identify. Support your solution with critical thinking that demonstrates an understanding of the course material, internet resources provided for this course, and real-life experiences.

Shy away from general statements and blanket conceptual recommendations that are not fully justified with the facts of the case.

Formatting and References

In addition to references in the textbook, you must include at least three quality outside current and updated references (properly vetted news sources, business publications, scholarly articles, etc.) to support the information you outline in your case study. You may “re-use” outside sources you found for your discussions as long as they truly support your response to the case study.

Clearly label and indicate each Problem Analysis with headings in your paper followed by your Problem Recommendation. Ultimately, the structure of the assignment should follow the 3-Step Problem-solving Approach:

• Synopsis
• Problem #1
• Cause of Problem #1
• Recommendation #1
• Problem #2
• Cause of Problem #2
• Recommendation #2
• Problem #3
• Cause of Problem #3
• Recommendation #3

PROBLEM-SOLVING APPLICATION CASE

Incentives Gone Wrong, Then Wrong Again, and Wrong Again

Money is an important tool for both attracting and motivating talent. If you owned a company or were its CEO, you would likely agree and choose performance management practices to deliver such outcomes. It also is possible you’d use incentives to help align your employees’ interests, behaviors, and performance with those of the company. After all, countless companies have used incentives very successfully, but not all. The incentives used by Wells Fargo had disastrous consequences for employees, customers, and the company itself.

THE SCENARIO AND BEHAVIORS

A client enters a bank branch and opens a checking account. The performance expectations of the banker that helped open the account were to open eight accounts for each customer, which meant he or she needed to persuade that customer to open seven additional accounts! This resulted in the banker then attempting to open a savings account and maybe a credit card account, simple enough. But the problem happened when the customer left without opening additional accounts and many bankers went ahead and did so anyway without the customer’s consent. Customers who had mortgages with the bank sometimes had insurance policies opened without their knowledge. The bank also financed automobiles for many customers, and insurance was also often added unknowingly to these. Small business customers were frequently overcharged for credit cards and other services. More generally, customers for one product were cross-sold other products, and along with many of these additional accounts there were fees. The increased number of accounts helped employees meet their numbers, and the fees provided still more income for the bank.112

Even after all of these efforts, many bankers still fell short of their goals and opened accounts in family members’ names. One branch manager opened 24 accounts in her teenage daughter’s name and 21 In her husband’s. Other reports include Wells Fargo bankers canvassing employees at stores in which they shopped.113 Pet insurance was added in some instances!114

Some sham accounts were closed once the employee received credit, but many remained open, charging fees and affecting customers’ credit.

THE DAMAGE TO CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES

Wells employees created approximately 3.5 million fake accounts; even now precise numbers are difficult to obtain. But it seems as if 1.5 million deposit and 500,000 credit card accounts were opened without customer consent, and it erroneously foreclosed on over 400 mortgages and repossessed thousands of cars. Over 800,000 customers with auto loans were charged for auto insurance.115 The list goes on.

The negative consequences within Wells Fargo also have been enormous. CEO John Stumpf was ousted along with former head of community banking, Carrie Tolstedt. Seventy-five million dollars in compensation was clawed back from these two executives, as it was considered ill-gotten and due to illegal or at least unprofessional behaviors. The same executives lost additional millions in compensation, and approximately 5,300 employees were fired. Numerous regulatory agencies fined Wells Fargo for nearly $200 million, the company’s stock underperformed its competitors’, and it is difficult to estimate the cost of damage to the company’s reputation and the resulting lost business.116 Above all, there are the incalculable costs to customers in money, frustration, ruined credit, lost vehicles, and lost homes.

THE CULPRITS

Much of this carnage has now been attributed to perverse incentives and poor leadership. Investigations revealed that both Stumpf and Tolstedt were well aware of these unethical behaviors, but they turned a blind eye or even encouraged these behaviors. It was reported that Tolstedt repeatedly denied and resisted complaints about goals being unachievable and problematic.117 But what about the thousands of employees that actually opened the accounts? When writing about the Wells Fargo scandal, Professor Elizabeth Tippett noted, “Research suggests that ethical behavior is not about who you are or the values you hold. Behavior is often a function of the situation in which you make the decision, even factors you barely notice.”118

Another interesting detail regarding performance expectations is that the eight-account expectation for every customer was only three 10 years earlier. It also is important to note that this sort of cross-selling Page 248­(multiple products to the same customer) was something Wells was known for and contributed to its past success. It’s been reported that the reason for eight instead of another number was that CEO Stumpf said it rhymed with “great.”

ACTIONS

To be fair, numerous examples exist of Wells Fargo management explicitly instructing employees not to engage in such activities, including ethics training and the deployment of risk professionals to identify and correct inappropriate conduct. But this obviously wasn’t enough, and even though employees were expected to report any misdeeds, they didn’t. Incentives stayed in place and employees continued to be pressured and even fired if they did not make their sales quotas. Some involved in the scandal argued it isn’t the employees’ fault, they needed a paycheck and this is what their employer required.119 Tim Sloan, who worked at Wells for decades, was inserted as the new CEO and charged with cleaning up the mess, restoring the bank’s reputation, and warding off a potential new $1 billion fine.120

Sloan worked in the role for two years before stepping down in 2019, presumably for not being able to turn things around.121 Whoever replaces him has the same challenges. Assume you are the new CEO, what would you do?