|Citation: Kochan, J. A., Desclos, E. C., Bosch, R., Meister, L., Vriend, L. E., Attikum, H. V., & Krawczyk, P. M. (2018). Quality of life in people with vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Dermatology, 177(6), 12625–12637. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15933|
|Are the results of this systematic review valid?|
|1. Was the review question clearly and explicitly stated? Was it a focused review question?
|2. What was the review question?||
|3. Did the systematic review include a methods section that described:|
|a) a comprehensive, exhaustive search strategy for finding and including all the relevant studies? What databases and sources were searched? Was the search adequate? Were non-English studies excluded?|
|b) the criteria used to decide which studies to include in the review (i.e. were the inclusion criteria reported and justified?) Was study selection reproducibly done (i.e. by two independent reviewers)? Was bias in selection of studies avoided?|
|c) how the reviewers assessed the validity (i.e. quality) of each study included in the review? Was study quality assessment reproducibly done (i.e. by two independent reviewers)? Were all the included studies of high methodologic quality?|
|4. If meta-analysis was done, how were the study results combined (pooled)? Were the meta-analysis methods appropriate? What statistical model was used for meta-analysis?
|5. Did the reviewers check for heterogeneity? What method was used?
|6. Did the reviewers check for publication bias? What method was used? Is it likely that relevant studies were missed?
|7. Did the reviewers assess the potential impact of study quality on the results of the SR?|
Any other potential biases or flaws in this systematic review?
What are the results?
|What are the results of the systematic review?
|1. Were the results similar from study to study, both clinically and statistically?
ü Were the populations of the different studies similar?
ü Was the same exposure/intervention evaluated by the individual studies?
ü Was the same outcome evaluated by the individual studies?
ü If heterogeneity was found, did the reviewers seek to explore reasons for heterogeneity?
ü What methods (e.g. subgroup analysis or meta-regression) were used to ascertain reasons for heterogeneity?
|2. What are the overall results of the review?||
|3. How precise were the results?||
|4. Were conclusions made by the review authors supported by the data presented in the review?
|What are the major strengths of this systematic review?
|What are the major limitations of this systematic review?
|Based on your assessment of this systematic review, would you accept the conclusions of the review?
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
At Custom Writing, we believe in exemplary services that are fully geared toward customer satisfaction. That is why we don’t shy away from giving you the following guarantees;
Trusting us with your work is the best decision you have made, our pleasure lies in seeing you satisfied at 100%. If in the rear chance it happens that you are not satisfied, then know that we will equally not be satisfied. But worry not, our 30 days- Money back guarantee is all you need and that is what we promise you..Read more
We utilize profoundly equipped and gifted writers who produce unique papers liberated from any form of plagiarism. To guarantee this, we run all papers finished by our scholars through a Plagiarism checker to ensure uniqueness and originality. In any case, on the off chance that you have vulnerabilities about the originality or falsification of any paper we have finished and conveyed to you, please get in touch with us straight away. We will quickly investigate, and if the paper is seen as counterfeited, we will take suitable actions including but not limited to, revising the paper for free and in extreme cases we will activate the money back guarantee.Read more
We have an obligation deliver great and specially composed assignments. Our revision strategy endeavors to ensure total client satisfaction, comfort, and a genuine feelings of serenity. We make minor updates and corrections to the underlying request as part of our continuous assistance. However, revisions should just incorporate changes and alterations that were not effectively met, in the underlying request and that are inside the rules as per the current request structure..Read more
Our client's Data is an Integral part of our business but clearly, we are not in the business of offering our clients' very own data to others. We realize that you care how your online data is utilized and shared, we equally value your trust that we will do so cautiously and sensibly. We Promise to ensure the security of your own data during transmission by utilizing encryption conventions and programming. Likewise assist us with securing your information by not sharing your passwords and usernames.Read more
In submitting a request with us, you consent to the services we give. We will strive to take the necessary steps to convey a far reaching paper according to your prerequisites. Equally we depend on your cooperation to guarantee that we convey on this order.Read more