Administrative Law

1
Laws 3300 Administrative Law
Assignment 2
S2, 2020
Question 1(A) (50%)
The Childcare Centres Act 2010 (Cth) (the Act) [a fictional Act] creates the Childcare Centre
Authority (the Authority). Relevantly, the Authority’s function is to consider and determine
applications for licences allowing persons to operate childcare centres.
The Act prescribes a number of matters the Authority must take into account in deciding whether to
grant an applicant such a licence. One is that the applicant is a ‘fit and proper person’.
Mr Liam Gray, who received his Australian citizenship by conferral, seeks a licence under the Act.
His application appears to meet all criteria specified by the Act. During the course of its consideration
of his application, however, it comes to the Authority’s attention, via an anonymous letter, that some
twenty years ago Mr Gray was convicted of a number of burglary offences.
A day after receiving the letter, the Authority, refuses to grant him a licence. It provides reasons for
its decision which include this passage:
Nevertheless, given the fact of Mr Gray’s burglary convictions in 1998 and tendency towards
crime which appears common to people from his country of origin, the Authority is of the
view that he is incapable of meeting the “fit and proper person” criterion in the Act, and
accordingly his application for a statutory licence is refused.
1) Mr Gray approaches you. Advise him whether he may commence review proceedings
challenging the Authority’s refusal to grant him a licence and, if so, where, and what
issues are likely to arise.
Recall Mr Liam Gray from Question 1(A). Assume that the Authority’s initial consideration of his
application did not uncover his 1998 burglary convictions and that his application duly proceeded to
decision and he was granted a licence under the Act.
18 months after the grant of the statutory licence, the Authority receives anonymous information to
the effect that Mr Gray is operating his licensed childcare centre contrary to the terms of his licence.
The information suggests that children at the centre are insufficiently supervised and that some staff
are insufficiently qualified.
(For the purpose of the following analysis, assume that certain staffing ratios and certain staff
qualifications are statutory conditions of Mr Gray’s licence).
The Authority is concerned by the information. It decides to engage a firm of solicitors, Best & Co,
to investigate Mr Liam Gray’s conduct of the centre and provide a report to the Authority.
2) Mr Liam Gray approaches you. He has heard rumours about the information but does
not know exactly what it is or who provided it to the Authority. He is concerned that
Best & Co’s investigation of him is going to be a “headache” for his business and
prejudice its commercial reputation. He seeks your advice about whether he can “shut
down” the Best & Co investigation.
2
Question 2 (25%)
The Foreign Compensation (East Timor) Act 2004 (Cth) vests certain functions in the Foreign
Compensation Board. It also provides:
Section 1. A company may claim compensation for loss of property situated off the coast of
East Timor on 4 June 2004.
Section 2. The Foreign Compensation Board may grant a claim provided the company which
is claiming compensation is based in Australia.
Section 3. The determination by the Board of any application made to it under this Act is final
and conclusive and must not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed or called in
question in any legal proceedings whatsoever.
Anapurna Corporation Pty Ltd (AC) is a company registered under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
with an office in Darwin. It is part of a multinational group of companies involved in oil exploration.
AC was licensed to conduct oil exploration off the East Timor coast. AC had been prospecting for oil
in the region since 1996. The AC Board has been donating funds to East Timor for some time, with
a view to obtaining permission from the East Timorese Government to prospect in the area should
existing licences of foreign companies be cancelled.
On 4 June 2004, all existing prospecting leases off the coast of East Timor were cancelled as part of
the dispute over the boundaries of East Timor’s territorial waters. AC seeks compensation from the
Foreign Compensation Board. The claim is rejected.
The Board’s reasons are furnished by letter. In part, the letter says:
The Board does not have jurisdiction to consider the application as AC is not based in
Australia since information available to it indicates that the company’s headquarters are in
New Delhi, India.
The Board continued:
Even if this is incorrect, the Board would still reject your claim, as it is the policy of the Board
only to pay compensation to companies which are making a claim in respect of physical
property. You are only claiming for the loss of the licence, not for physical property. Finally,
the Board is not willing to uphold a claim from a company which has been donating money
to the East Timorese Government since it appears likely that the company will be able to
obtain permission from the East Timorese Government to continue prospecting in the area.
1) AC seeks your advice about whether it can challenge the decision.
Fishwatch, a group trying to increase numbers of pipefish (found near the coast of East Timor), feels
that the decision to cancel all existing prospecting leases off the coast of East Timor will hardly impact
pipefish numbers and takes the view that it is unnecessary to cancel the leases just because of the
dispute over the boundaries of East Timor’s territorial waters.
2) Fishwatch seeks your advice about whether it can challenge the decision.
Question 3 (25%)
What is the so-called ‘integrity branch’ of government? Should it be considered the fourth branch of
government and why or why not?

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
At Custom Writing, we believe in exemplary services that are fully geared toward customer satisfaction. That is why we don’t shy away from giving you the following guarantees;

Money-back guarantee

Trusting us with your work is the best decision you have made, our pleasure lies in seeing you satisfied at 100%. If in the rear chance it happens that you are not satisfied, then know that we will equally not be satisfied. But worry not, our 30 days- Money back guarantee is all you need and that is what we promise you..

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

We utilize profoundly equipped and gifted writers who produce unique papers liberated from any form of plagiarism. To guarantee this, we run all papers finished by our scholars through a Plagiarism checker to ensure uniqueness and originality. In any case, on the off chance that you have vulnerabilities about the originality or falsification of any paper we have finished and conveyed to you, please get in touch with us straight away. We will quickly investigate, and if the paper is seen as counterfeited, we will take suitable actions including but not limited to, revising the paper for free and in extreme cases we will activate the money back guarantee.

Read more

Free-revision policy

We have an obligation deliver great and specially composed assignments. Our revision strategy endeavors to ensure total client satisfaction, comfort, and a genuine feelings of serenity. We make minor updates and corrections to the underlying request as part of our continuous assistance. However, revisions should just incorporate changes and alterations that were not effectively met, in the underlying request and that are inside the rules as per the current request structure..

Read more

Privacy policy

Our client's Data is an Integral part of our business but clearly, we are not in the business of offering our clients' very own data to others. We realize that you care how your online data is utilized and shared, we equally value your trust that we will do so cautiously and sensibly. We Promise to ensure the security of your own data during transmission by utilizing encryption conventions and programming. Likewise assist us with securing your information by not sharing your passwords and usernames.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

In submitting a request with us, you consent to the services we give. We will strive to take the necessary steps to convey a far reaching paper according to your prerequisites. Equally we depend on your cooperation to guarantee that we convey on this order.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency